skip navigation
Home | zeronumbers
Эта страница на русском

About quality of articles in the internet

In my opinion that is because articles are often written by single person or small group of people, but the articles are needed everyday.

That is why producing good articles about different subjects is hard and most of the time the person that is writing the article is not competent.

For those few hours that person spend studying subject he has seen only the tip of the iceberg.

Now you may ask why not just paste the article of a specialist?

This approach has some drawbacks too. Not only it is difficult to write such articles for author but it is also hard to comprehend for readers.

What if we take work of a specialist and compress it? Is it really possible to compress an article? If so then why the author didn’t do that?

The best part is search engines that give you penalty if you copy paste text. That is why we can see multiple websites with same articles but with slightly different words being used. It is very same article that was rewritten to bypass search engines.

Work process:

  1. Person that is not competent in subject spends few hours searching for good sources. Article can be ruined already if the source is bad. How do you know if the source is good when you are not competent in the subject?
  2. After source is found you need to compress it. Another opportunity to ruin article. Is it possible to compress? How do you know what should be left out if you are not competent in the subject?
  3. After that another person takes compressed article and rewrites it. Again another mistake can be made on this stage.

So as a result we get an article that was stolen, compressed and rewritten. What kind of quality can be expected from that?

Get more people, for example 30 people where each person writes one article in 30 days. This way you still can produce articles everyday and the quality would be much better. The price of articles is also much higher.